What is the radiation before 5G? A correlation study between measurements in situ and in real time and epidemiological indicators in Vallecas, Madrid
← Research streamIn this neighborhood survey with in-home/outdoor RF measurements, higher measured power density was reported to be associated with headaches (presence and intensity), nightmares, fewer hours of sleep, dizziness frequency, and instability episode frequency, wi…
Study snapshot
Abstract
What is the radiation before 5G? A correlation study between measurements in situ and in real time and epidemiological indicators in Vallecas, Madrid Isabel López, Nazario Félix, Marco Rivera,Adrián Alonso, Ceferino Maestú. What is the radiation before 5G? A correlation study between measurements in situ and in real time and epidemiological indicators in Vallecas, Madrid. Environ Res. 2021 Mar;194:110734. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110734. Abstract Background: Exposure of the general population to electromagnetic radiation emitted by mobile phone base stations is one of the greater concerns of residents affected by the proximity of these structures due to the possible relationship between radiated levels and health indicators. Objectives: This study aimed to find a possible relationship between some health indicators and electromagnetic radiation measurements. Methods: A total of 268 surveys, own design, were completed by residents of a Madrid neighborhood surrounded by nine telephone antennas, and 105 measurements of electromagnetic radiation were taken with a spectrum analyzer and an isotropic antenna, in situ and in real - time, both outside and inside the houses. Results: It was shown statistically significant p - values in headaches presence (p = 0.010), nightmares (p = 0.001), headache intensity (p < 0.001), dizziness frequency (p = 0.011), instability episodes frequency (p = 0.026), number of hours that one person sleeps per day (p < 0.001) and three of nine parameters studied from tiredness. Concerning cancer, there are 5.6% of cancer cases in the study population, a percentage 10 times higher than that of the total Spanish population. Discussion: People who are exposed to higher radiation values present more severe headaches, dizziness and nightmares. Moreover, they sleep fewer hours. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Highlights • People who are exposed to higher radiation values present more severe headaches, dizziness and nightmares. • The methodology for obtaining electromagnetic radiation measurements should be reviewed. • The population continues to receive radiation peaks in distances greater than 200 m, no one is free from exposure. Conclusion In conclusion, the data obtained shows that there is a relationship between the power density of radiation that a person receives at home every day and the presence of headaches, as well as the presence of sleep disorders. People who receive higher doses of radiation sleep less hours and have nightmares at night. In addition, these people suffer from headaches with greater intensity and are more prone to dizziness. In this study, indicators like fainting episodes, presence of tachycardias or instability cannot be related. No conclusive results were found for fatigue, since, out of nine parameters studied, only a statistically significant relationship was found in three of them. The study of how electromagnetic fields affect health, should not only be done in relation to cancer, but also health indicators related to day to day. The methodology for obtaining electromagnetic radiation measurements should be reviewed, the averaged radiation measurements that are described in the CENELEC standard are not the most appropriate, they should be carried out in a narrow band and with maximum peak measurements. The measured intensity depends fundamentally on the direction of the fundamental radiation beam and not so much on the distance to the antenna. In the beam direction, differences are found in the presence of pathologies with respect to distances, when these are greater than 200 m. Even at this distance, the population continues to receive radiation peaks, so that no one is free from exposure to these radiation sources. The need for this study is related to the situation before 5G in terms of electromagnetic radiation rates. This study may be compared with the new radiant procedures that will be adopted in a short time.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In this neighborhood survey with in-home/outdoor RF measurements, higher measured power density was reported to be associated with headaches (presence and intensity), nightmares, fewer hours of sleep, dizziness frequency, and instability episode frequency, with several statistically significant p-values reported. The authors report no relationship for fainting episodes, tachycardias, or instability presence, and mixed/non-conclusive findings for fatigue (3 of 9 parameters significant). The abstract notes 5.6% cancer cases in the study population, described as higher than the total Spanish population, but does not report an exposure-response analysis for cancer.
Outcomes measured
- Headaches (presence, intensity)
- Nightmares
- Sleep duration (hours per day)
- Dizziness frequency
- Instability episodes frequency
- Tiredness/fatigue parameters
- Fainting episodes
- Tachycardias
- Cancer prevalence (self-reported/observed in study population)
Limitations
- Cross-sectional correlation design; cannot establish causality
- Health indicators based on surveys (self-report)
- Potential confounding factors not described in the abstract
- Exposure metrics and measurement methodology are questioned by the authors (need to review averaging vs peak/narrow-band measurements)
- Cancer comparison is ecological/descriptive in the abstract and may not account for population differences
View raw extracted JSON
{
"publication_year": 2021,
"study_type": "cross_sectional",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "mobile phone base stations",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "daily at-home exposure (measured in situ and in real time)"
},
"population": "Residents of a Madrid neighborhood (Vallecas) surrounded by nine telephone antennas",
"sample_size": 268,
"outcomes": [
"Headaches (presence, intensity)",
"Nightmares",
"Sleep duration (hours per day)",
"Dizziness frequency",
"Instability episodes frequency",
"Tiredness/fatigue parameters",
"Fainting episodes",
"Tachycardias",
"Cancer prevalence (self-reported/observed in study population)"
],
"main_findings": "In this neighborhood survey with in-home/outdoor RF measurements, higher measured power density was reported to be associated with headaches (presence and intensity), nightmares, fewer hours of sleep, dizziness frequency, and instability episode frequency, with several statistically significant p-values reported. The authors report no relationship for fainting episodes, tachycardias, or instability presence, and mixed/non-conclusive findings for fatigue (3 of 9 parameters significant). The abstract notes 5.6% cancer cases in the study population, described as higher than the total Spanish population, but does not report an exposure-response analysis for cancer.",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"Cross-sectional correlation design; cannot establish causality",
"Health indicators based on surveys (self-report)",
"Potential confounding factors not described in the abstract",
"Exposure metrics and measurement methodology are questioned by the authors (need to review averaging vs peak/narrow-band measurements)",
"Cancer comparison is ecological/descriptive in the abstract and may not account for population differences"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"stance": "concern",
"stance_confidence": 0.78,
"summary": "This cross-sectional correlation study surveyed 268 residents in Vallecas (Madrid) and conducted 105 RF measurements inside and outside homes near nine mobile phone base station antennas. The authors report statistically significant associations between higher measured power density and several symptoms, including headaches, nightmares, reduced sleep hours, and dizziness. They report no relationship for some indicators (e.g., fainting episodes, tachycardias) and non-conclusive results for fatigue, and they argue measurement methodology should be reviewed.",
"key_points": [
"268 resident surveys and 105 RF measurements were collected in situ and in real time inside and outside homes.",
"Higher measured RF power density was reported to be associated with headaches (presence and intensity).",
"Higher exposure was also reported to be associated with nightmares and fewer hours of sleep.",
"Associations were reported for dizziness frequency and instability episode frequency, while some indicators were not related.",
"Fatigue findings were described as non-conclusive, with significance in 3 of 9 fatigue parameters.",
"The abstract reports 5.6% cancer cases in the study population but does not describe an exposure-response analysis for cancer.",
"The authors state that averaged measurements per CENELEC may be inappropriate and recommend narrow-band peak measurements."
],
"categories": [
"Radiofrequency (RF)",
"Base Stations & Small Cells",
"Exposure Assessment",
"Epidemiology",
"Symptoms & Sleep"
],
"tags": [
"Base Stations",
"Power Density",
"Spectrum Analyzer Measurements",
"In-Home Measurements",
"Cross-Sectional Survey",
"Headaches",
"Sleep Disorders",
"Nightmares",
"Dizziness",
"Fatigue",
"Cancer Prevalence",
"Peak Measurements",
"CENELEC Standard"
],
"keywords": [
"electromagnetic radiation",
"mobile phone base stations",
"power density",
"spectrum analyzer",
"isotropic antenna",
"survey",
"headache",
"sleep disorders",
"nightmares",
"dizziness",
"Vallecas",
"Madrid"
],
"suggested_hubs": [],
"social": {
"tweet": "Study in Vallecas (Madrid) combined 268 resident surveys with 105 RF measurements near 9 base-station antennas, reporting higher measured power density associated with headaches, nightmares, fewer sleep hours and dizziness; some outcomes showed no association and fatigue results were mixed.",
"facebook": "A cross-sectional study in Vallecas (Madrid) surveyed 268 residents and took 105 RF measurements inside/outside homes near nine base-station antennas. The authors report associations between higher measured power density and headaches, nightmares, reduced sleep hours and dizziness, while other indicators showed no relationship and fatigue findings were mixed.",
"linkedin": "Environmental Research (2021) reports a cross-sectional correlation study in Vallecas (Madrid) combining 268 resident surveys with 105 RF measurements inside/outside homes near nine base-station antennas. Higher measured power density was reported to correlate with headaches (presence/intensity), nightmares, fewer sleep hours and dizziness, with mixed findings for fatigue and no association for some indicators; authors also call for reviewing measurement methodology (peak/narrow-band vs averaged)."
}
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110734
PubMed: 33434609
Related papers
- Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations. 2006
- Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure--a questionnaire survey. 2004
- Research on Electromagnetic Radiation Safety Assessment of Co-construction and Sharing 5G Network 2022
- Microwave Radiation and the Brain: Mechanisms, Current Status, and Future Prospects 2022
- Mobile phone electromagnetic radiation and the risk of headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2022
- Correlation of Blood Oxidative Stress Parameters to Indoor Radiofrequency Radiation: A Cross Sectional Study in Jordan 2020