Artificial EMG (electromyogram) by WLAN exposure

2021 · Harm · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
HarmInsufficient evidencePaper 1149

The author reports finding artificial signals in the nervous system (described as artificial EMG) that depended on WLAN exposure, stated as contrasting with ICNIRP safety guideline assumptions of no bioeffect at low-energy fields.

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2021
Study typeunknown
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Artificial EMG (electromyogram) by WLAN exposure Lebrecht von Klitzing. Artificial EMG (electromyogram) by WLAN exposure. Journal of Biostatistics and Biometric Applications. 6(1): 2021. Abstract WLAN (wireless local area network) is used as an important worldwide communication-technique. By this, always there is an electromagnetic field exposure. In contrast to the ICNIRP-safety guidelines, whereby no bioeffect is possible by these low-energetic electromagnetic fields, we found artificial signals in the nervous system in dependence on WLAN- exposure, Open access paper: annexpublishers.com

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeunknown
Effect directionharm
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 46% · Peer reviewed: unknown

Main findings

The author reports finding artificial signals in the nervous system (described as artificial EMG) that depended on WLAN exposure, stated as contrasting with ICNIRP safety guideline assumptions of no bioeffect at low-energy fields.

Outcomes measured

  • Artificial EMG (electromyogram) signals
  • Nervous system signals (artifacts)

Limitations

  • No methods, population details, exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, power/SAR), or sample size are provided in the abstract.
  • Study design and measurement approach are not described, limiting interpretability.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "unknown",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "wi-fi",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Artificial EMG (electromyogram) signals",
    "Nervous system signals (artifacts)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The author reports finding artificial signals in the nervous system (described as artificial EMG) that depended on WLAN exposure, stated as contrasting with ICNIRP safety guideline assumptions of no bioeffect at low-energy fields.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "No methods, population details, exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, power/SAR), or sample size are provided in the abstract.",
    "Study design and measurement approach are not described, limiting interpretability."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.46,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
  "keywords": [
    "WLAN",
    "Wi-Fi",
    "RF exposure",
    "electromagnetic field",
    "EMG",
    "electromyogram",
    "nervous system",
    "ICNIRP"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "school-wi-fi",
      "weight": 0.55,
      "reason": "Focuses on WLAN/Wi‑Fi exposure and reported biological/physiological signals."
    },
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.5,
      "reason": "Explicitly discusses ICNIRP safety guidelines in relation to reported effects."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library