Residential exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): a dose-response meta-analysis

2021 · No effect · High evidence

← Research stream
No effectHigh evidencePaper 1124

This dose-response meta-analysis of six studies found little evidence of a positive association between residential magnetic field exposure (assessed by distance to overhead power lines and/or magnetic-field modelling) and ALS risk. The highest exposure categ…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2021
Study typemeta_analysis
Reported directionNo effect
Evidence ratingHigh

Abstract

Residential exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): a dose-response meta-analysis Tommaso Filippini, Elizabeth E Hatch, Marco Vinceti. Residential exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a dose-response meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 7;11(1):11939. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91349-2. Abstract Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is neurodegenerative disease characterized by a fatal prognosis and still unknown etiology. Some environmental risk factors have been suggested, including exposure to magnetic fields. Studies have suggested positive associations in occupationally-exposed populations, but the link with residential exposure is still debated as is the shape of such relation. Due to recent availability of advanced biostatistical tools for dose-response meta-analysis, we carried out a systematic review in order to assess the dose-response association between ALS and residential exposure to magnetic fields. We performed an online literature searching through April 30, 2021. Studies were included if they assessed residential exposure to electromagnetic fields, based either on distance from overhead power lines or on magnetic field modelling techniques, and if they reported risk estimates for ALS. We identified six eligible studies, four using distance-based and one modelling-based exposure assessment, and one both methods. Both distance-based and particularly modelling- based exposure estimates appeared to be associated with a decreased ALS risk in the highest exposure category, although estimates were very imprecise (summary RRs 0.87, 95% CI 0.63-1.20, and 0.27, 95% CI 0.05-1.36). Dose-response meta-analysis also showed little association between distance from power lines and ALS, with no evidence of any threshold. Overall, we found scant evidence of a positive association between residential magnetic fields exposure and ALS, although the available data were too limited to conduct a dose-response analysis for the modelled magnetic field estimates or to perform stratified analyses. Conclusions Overall, we found little association between exposure to magnetic fields and risk of ALS, using either distance from high-voltage overhead power lines or magnetic field modelling, although the available data were too limited to conduct a dose–response analysis for the modelled exposure studies or to perform further stratified analyses. Therefore, possible associations between magnetic fields exposure and ALS risk in selected subgroups and at very high exposure cannot be entirely ruled out. Open access paper: nature.com

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typemeta_analysis
Effect directionno_effect
PopulationResidential populations assessed for ALS risk in included epidemiologic studies
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureELF
Evidence strengthHighConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

This dose-response meta-analysis of six studies found little evidence of a positive association between residential magnetic field exposure (assessed by distance to overhead power lines and/or magnetic-field modelling) and ALS risk. The highest exposure categories suggested decreased risk for both distance-based and especially modelling-based estimates, but the estimates were imprecise. Dose-response analysis showed little association between distance from power lines and ALS and no evidence of a threshold.

Outcomes measured

  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) risk/incidence

Limitations

  • Only six eligible studies were identified.
  • Risk estimates for highest exposure categories were imprecise (wide confidence intervals).
  • Data were too limited to conduct dose-response analysis for modelled magnetic field estimates.
  • Insufficient data to perform stratified analyses; associations in subgroups or at very high exposure could not be ruled out.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "publication_year": 2021,
  "study_type": "meta_analysis",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "power lines",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Residential populations assessed for ALS risk in included epidemiologic studies",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) risk/incidence"
  ],
  "main_findings": "This dose-response meta-analysis of six studies found little evidence of a positive association between residential magnetic field exposure (assessed by distance to overhead power lines and/or magnetic-field modelling) and ALS risk. The highest exposure categories suggested decreased risk for both distance-based and especially modelling-based estimates, but the estimates were imprecise. Dose-response analysis showed little association between distance from power lines and ALS and no evidence of a threshold.",
  "effect_direction": "no_effect",
  "limitations": [
    "Only six eligible studies were identified.",
    "Risk estimates for highest exposure categories were imprecise (wide confidence intervals).",
    "Data were too limited to conduct dose-response analysis for modelled magnetic field estimates.",
    "Insufficient data to perform stratified analyses; associations in subgroups or at very high exposure could not be ruled out."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "high",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "stance": "reassurance",
  "stance_confidence": 0.72,
  "summary": "This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis evaluated whether residential magnetic field exposure is associated with ALS risk. Across six eligible studies using distance to overhead power lines and/or magnetic-field modelling, the analysis found little evidence of a positive association. Estimates in the highest exposure categories suggested decreased risk but were very imprecise, and limited data prevented more detailed dose-response and subgroup analyses.",
  "key_points": [
    "The paper reports a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of residential electromagnetic (magnetic) field exposure and ALS risk.",
    "Six studies met inclusion criteria, using distance from overhead power lines and/or magnetic-field modelling for exposure assessment.",
    "Highest exposure categories showed summary estimates below 1.0 for both distance-based and modelling-based exposure, but with wide confidence intervals.",
    "Dose-response analysis indicated little association between distance from power lines and ALS and no evidence of a threshold effect.",
    "The authors conclude there is scant evidence for a positive association between residential magnetic fields and ALS.",
    "Limited data prevented dose-response analysis for modelled exposure studies and stratified analyses.",
    "The authors note that associations in selected subgroups or at very high exposure cannot be entirely ruled out."
  ],
  "categories": [
    "Epidemiology",
    "Neurodegenerative Disease",
    "Power Lines",
    "Extremely Low Frequency (ELF)"
  ],
  "tags": [
    "Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis",
    "Dose-Response Meta-Analysis",
    "Systematic Review",
    "Residential Exposure",
    "Magnetic Fields",
    "Overhead Power Lines",
    "Distance-Based Exposure",
    "Magnetic Field Modelling",
    "Risk Ratio"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "ALS",
    "amyotrophic lateral sclerosis",
    "residential exposure",
    "magnetic fields",
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "power lines",
    "distance",
    "modelling",
    "dose-response",
    "meta-analysis"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "power-lines",
      "weight": 0.95,
      "reason": "Exposure assessment focused on distance from high-voltage overhead power lines and magnetic-field modelling related to power lines."
    }
  ],
  "social": {
    "tweet": "Meta-analysis (6 studies) found little evidence that residential magnetic-field exposure (power-line distance/modelling) increases ALS risk; highest exposure categories suggested lower risk but estimates were imprecise and data limited.",
    "facebook": "A 2021 systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of six studies reported little evidence of a positive association between residential magnetic-field exposure (including distance to overhead power lines) and ALS risk, though data were limited for detailed analyses.",
    "linkedin": "In a 2021 Sci Rep dose-response meta-analysis of six studies, residential magnetic-field exposure assessed via power-line distance and/or modelling showed little evidence of increased ALS risk; estimates at highest exposure were imprecise and limited data constrained subgroup analyses."
  }
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91349-2
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library