The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A protocol for a systematic review of human observational studies

Environment international · 2021 · Unclear · High evidence

← Research stream
UnclearHigh evidencePaper 1052

This paper presents a protocol for a WHO-commissioned systematic review to assess whether human observational studies support a causal association between RF-EMF exposure and neoplastic diseases. It describes planned eligibility criteria, search sources, risk…

Study snapshot

PublicationEnvironment international · 2021
Study typesystematic_review
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingHigh

Abstract

The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A protocol for a systematic review of human observational studies Susanna Lagorio, Maria Blettner, Dan Baaken, Maria Feychting, Ken Karipidis, Tom Loney, Nicola Orsini, Martin Röösli, Marilia Silva Paulo, Mark Elwood. The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A protocol for a systematic review of human observational studies. Environ Int. 2021 Aug 22;157:106828. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106828. Highlights • RF-EMF was classified by IARC as possibly carcinogenic to humans (2B) in May 2011 • A systematic review of all subject-relevant epidemiological studies is now needed. • A detailed protocol ensures the review's transparency, utility and credibility. • Original study validity will be evaluated with a customized OHAT risk of bias tool. • Internal coherence and external plausibility will inform conclusions. Abstract Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has an ongoing project to assess potential health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) in the general and working population. Here we present the protocol for a systematic review of the scientific literature on cancer hazards from exposure to RF- EMF in humans, commissioned by the WHO as part of that project. Objective: To assess the quality and strength of the evidence provided by human observational studies for a causal association between exposure to RF-EMF and risk of neoplastic diseases. Eligibility criteria: We will include cohort and case-control studies investigating neoplasia risks in relation to three types of exposure to RF-EMF: near-field, head-localized, exposure from wireless phone use (SR-A); far- field, whole body, environmental exposure from fixed-site transmitters (SR-B); near/far-field occupational exposures from use of handheld transceivers or RF-emitting equipment in the workplace (SR-C). While no restriction on tumour type will be applied, we will focus on selected neoplasms of the central nervous system (brain, meninges, pituitary gland, acoustic nerve) and salivary gland tumours (SR-A); brain tumours and leukaemias (SR-B, SR-C). Information sources: Eligible studies will be identified through Medline, Embase, and EMF-Portal. Risk-of-bias assessment: We will use a tailored version of the OHAT's tool to evaluate the study's internal validity. Data synthesis: We will consider separately studies on different tumours, neoplasm-specific risks from different exposure sources, and a given exposure-outcome pair in adults and children. When a quantitative synthesis of findings can be envisaged, the main aims of the meta-analysis will be to assess the strength of association and the shape of the exposure-response relationship; to quantify the degree of heterogeneity across studies; and explore the sources of inconsistency (if any). When a meta-analysis is judged inappropriate, we will perform a narrative synthesis, complemented by a structured tabulation of results and appropriate visual displays. Evidence assessment: Confidence in evidence will be assessed in line with the GRADE approach. Funding: This project is supported by the World Health Organization. Co-financing was provided by the New Zealand Ministry of Health; the Istituto Superiore di Sanità in its capacity as a WHO Collaborating Centre for Radiation and Health; ARPANSA as a WHO Collaborating Centre for Radiation Protection. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021236798. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typesystematic_review
Effect directionunclear
PopulationGeneral and working population (adults and children) in human observational studies
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthHighConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

This paper presents a protocol for a WHO-commissioned systematic review to assess whether human observational studies support a causal association between RF-EMF exposure and neoplastic diseases. It describes planned eligibility criteria, search sources, risk-of-bias assessment, and approaches to meta-analysis or narrative synthesis, but does not report results.

Outcomes measured

  • Neoplastic diseases (cancer)
  • Central nervous system tumors (brain, meninges, pituitary gland, acoustic nerve)
  • Salivary gland tumors
  • Leukaemias

Limitations

  • Protocol paper; no study results are presented in the abstract.
  • Specific exposure metrics (e.g., frequency, SAR, duration) are not detailed in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "publication_year": null,
  "study_type": "systematic_review",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "wireless phone use; fixed-site transmitters; occupational RF equipment/handheld transceivers",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "General and working population (adults and children) in human observational studies",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Neoplastic diseases (cancer)",
    "Central nervous system tumors (brain, meninges, pituitary gland, acoustic nerve)",
    "Salivary gland tumors",
    "Leukaemias"
  ],
  "main_findings": "This paper presents a protocol for a WHO-commissioned systematic review to assess whether human observational studies support a causal association between RF-EMF exposure and neoplastic diseases. It describes planned eligibility criteria, search sources, risk-of-bias assessment, and approaches to meta-analysis or narrative synthesis, but does not report results.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "Protocol paper; no study results are presented in the abstract.",
    "Specific exposure metrics (e.g., frequency, SAR, duration) are not detailed in the abstract."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "high",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "stance": "neutral",
  "stance_confidence": 0.7,
  "summary": "This article describes a protocol for a WHO-commissioned systematic review of human observational studies on radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) and cancer risk. The review plans to evaluate near-field head-localized exposure from wireless phone use, far-field environmental exposure from fixed-site transmitters, and occupational RF exposures. It outlines planned search strategies, a tailored OHAT risk-of-bias tool, and GRADE-based confidence assessment, but provides no findings.",
  "key_points": [
    "The paper is a protocol for a systematic review of RF-EMF exposure and cancer risk in humans.",
    "It is commissioned by the WHO as part of an ongoing project assessing potential health effects of RF-EMF.",
    "Eligible designs include cohort and case-control studies in general and working populations.",
    "Exposures are grouped into wireless phone use (near-field head-localized), fixed-site transmitters (far-field whole-body), and occupational RF sources (near/far-field).",
    "The review will focus on selected tumor types including CNS tumors, salivary gland tumors, and leukaemias depending on exposure category.",
    "Risk of bias will be assessed using a tailored OHAT tool and confidence in evidence will be evaluated using GRADE.",
    "Meta-analysis is planned when appropriate, otherwise narrative synthesis with structured tabulation will be used."
  ],
  "categories": [
    "Systematic Reviews & Protocols",
    "Cancer",
    "Radiofrequency (RF)"
  ],
  "tags": [
    "Systematic Review Protocol",
    "WHO Commissioned",
    "Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields",
    "RF-EMF",
    "Cancer Risk",
    "Neoplastic Diseases",
    "Wireless Phone Use",
    "Fixed-Site Transmitters",
    "Occupational Exposure",
    "Cohort Studies",
    "Case-Control Studies",
    "Risk Of Bias",
    "OHAT Tool",
    "GRADE",
    "Meta-Analysis Plan"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency",
    "RF-EMF",
    "cancer",
    "neoplasia",
    "systematic review",
    "protocol",
    "observational studies",
    "cohort",
    "case-control",
    "wireless phone",
    "base station",
    "fixed-site transmitters (SR-B)"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.86,
      "reason": "The protocol is commissioned and funded by the WHO and is part of a WHO project assessing RF-EMF health effects."
    },
    {
      "slug": "cell-phones",
      "weight": 0.78,
      "reason": "Includes near-field, head-localized exposure from wireless phone use (SR-A)."
    },
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.72,
      "reason": "Includes occupational RF exposures from handheld transceivers and RF-emitting workplace equipment (SR-C)."
    }
  ],
  "social": {
    "tweet": "New protocol (Environ Int, 2021): WHO-commissioned systematic review will assess whether human observational studies support a causal link between RF-EMF exposure (phones, transmitters, occupational sources) and cancer risk; outlines search, OHAT risk-of-bias, and GRADE methods.",
    "facebook": "A new Environ Int (2021) paper publishes the protocol for a WHO-commissioned systematic review on radiofrequency EMF (RF-EMF) exposure and cancer risk. It details how cohort and case-control studies on phone use, fixed-site transmitters, and occupational RF sources will be identified and assessed (OHAT risk-of-bias; GRADE confidence).",
    "linkedin": "Environ Int (2021) protocol: WHO-commissioned systematic review will evaluate human observational evidence on RF-EMF exposure (wireless phones, fixed-site transmitters, occupational RF sources) and cancer risk, using tailored OHAT risk-of-bias assessment and GRADE to rate confidence in evidence."
  }
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106828
PubMed: 34433115

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library