What evidence exists on the impact of anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on animals and plants in the environment? A systematic map protocol

2021 · Unclear · High evidence

← Research stream
UnclearHigh evidencePaper 953

This article is a protocol for a systematic map that will collate and describe evidence on whether anthropogenic RF EMF (100 kHz–300 GHz) has negative effects on plants and animals. It describes planned search, screening, and data extraction methods but does …

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2021
Study typesystematic_review
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingHigh

Abstract

What evidence exists on the impact of anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on animals and plants in the environment? A systematic map protocol Ken Karipidis, Chris Brzozek, Chhavi Raj Bhatt, Sarah Loughran, Andrew Wood. What evidence exists on the impact of anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on animals and plants in the environment? A systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence. 10(39). 21 December 2021. Abstract Background Exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMF), particularly from telecommunications sources, is one of the most common and fastest growing anthropogenic factors on the environment. In many countries, humans are protected from excessive RF EMF exposure by safety standards that are based on guidelines by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The ICNIRP guidelines are based on knowledge of how RF EMF affects the human body, however, there are currently no recognised international guidelines to specifically protect animals and plants. Whether the ICNIRP guidelines for humans is adequate to provide protection to the environment is a subject of active debate. This systematic map will collate all the available evidence on whether anthropogenic RF EMF has a negative effect on plants and animals in the environment. The map will also identify gaps in knowledge, recommend future research and inform environmental and radiation protection authorities. Methods The proposed systematic map will include peer-reviewed and grey literature published in English. The EMF—Portal, PubMed and Web of Science databases will be searched using a search string prepared by the review team and tested for comprehensiveness against a list of known relevant reviews. Once duplicates are removed, retrieved articles will be screened in three stages: title, abstract, and full text. Studies will be selected with a subject population of all plants and animals, with exposures to anthropogenic RF EMF (frequency range 100 kHz–300 GHz) compared to no or lower-level exposure, and for all outcomes related to the studied populations. Kappa statistic tests will be conducted at each stage to ensure consistency of decision-making regarding the predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eligible studies will then proceed to the data extraction phase, which will extract meta-data such as bibliographic information, taxonomic information, RF EMF exposure data, outcome(s), sample size, etc. The extracted data will then be organised into a systematic map and the findings summarised by cross-tabulating key meta-data variables in heat maps, charts or other data visualization methods. The systematic map will identify gaps in knowledge, priorities for future research and potential subtopics for further analysis and/or systematic review. Open access paper: environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com 00252-w

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typesystematic_review
Effect directionunclear
PopulationPlants and animals in the environment
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthHighConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

This article is a protocol for a systematic map that will collate and describe evidence on whether anthropogenic RF EMF (100 kHz–300 GHz) has negative effects on plants and animals. It describes planned search, screening, and data extraction methods but does not report results.

Outcomes measured

  • All outcomes related to the studied plant and animal populations (to be mapped)

Limitations

  • Protocol only; no results reported
  • Planned inclusion limited to English-language peer-reviewed and grey literature
  • Focuses on mapping and identifying gaps rather than estimating pooled effects
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "publication_year": 2021,
  "study_type": "systematic_review",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "telecommunications sources (anthropogenic RF EMF)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Plants and animals in the environment",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "All outcomes related to the studied plant and animal populations (to be mapped)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "This article is a protocol for a systematic map that will collate and describe evidence on whether anthropogenic RF EMF (100 kHz–300 GHz) has negative effects on plants and animals. It describes planned search, screening, and data extraction methods but does not report results.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "Protocol only; no results reported",
    "Planned inclusion limited to English-language peer-reviewed and grey literature",
    "Focuses on mapping and identifying gaps rather than estimating pooled effects"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "high",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "stance": "neutral",
  "stance_confidence": 0.7,
  "summary": "This paper presents a protocol for a systematic map on the effects of anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on plants and animals in the environment. It outlines planned methods to search peer-reviewed and grey literature and to extract metadata on exposures and outcomes across studies. No findings on health or ecological effects are reported because this is a protocol.",
  "key_points": [
    "The protocol targets anthropogenic RF EMF exposures in the 100 kHz–300 GHz range.",
    "The subject populations include all plants and animals, comparing higher exposure to no or lower exposure.",
    "Searches are planned in EMF-Portal, PubMed, and Web of Science using a tested search string.",
    "Screening is planned at title, abstract, and full-text stages with kappa testing for consistency.",
    "Data extraction is planned to include bibliographic, taxonomic, exposure, outcome, and sample size information.",
    "Results are intended to be presented as a systematic map with visual summaries (e.g., heat maps) and identification of evidence gaps."
  ],
  "categories": [
    "RF EMF",
    "Environmental Effects",
    "Plants",
    "Animals",
    "Evidence Synthesis"
  ],
  "tags": [
    "Systematic Map Protocol",
    "Anthropogenic RF EMF",
    "Telecommunications",
    "Environmental Exposure",
    "Plants",
    "Animals",
    "Evidence Mapping",
    "Literature Search",
    "ICNIRP Guidelines",
    "Research Gaps"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency",
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "anthropogenic",
    "environment",
    "plants",
    "animals",
    "systematic map",
    "protocol",
    "telecommunications",
    "ICNIRP"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [],
  "social": {
    "tweet": "Protocol for a systematic map to collate evidence on whether anthropogenic RF EMF (100 kHz–300 GHz) affects plants and animals in the environment; outlines search, screening, and data extraction methods (no results yet).",
    "facebook": "This open-access protocol describes how a systematic map will gather and organize evidence on potential effects of anthropogenic radiofrequency EMF on plants and animals, including planned searches, screening steps, and data extraction (no findings reported).",
    "linkedin": "A systematic map protocol detailing methods to identify and organize peer-reviewed and grey literature on environmental impacts of anthropogenic RF EMF (100 kHz–300 GHz) on plants and animals; focuses on evidence mapping and research gaps rather than results."
  }
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1186/s13750-021
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library