A Review of the Effect of the Intermediate Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Female Reproduction

Health physics · 2022 · Mixed · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream

MixedInsufficient evidencePaper 937

Study snapshot

PublicationHealth physics · 2022

Study typereview

Reported directionMixed

Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

A Review of the Effect of the Intermediate Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Female Reproduction Stephanie Mohammed. A Review of the Effect of the Intermediate Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Female Reproduction. Health Phys. 2022 Jan 7. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001516. Abstract The use of intermediate frequency (IF) fields in occupational equipment and domestic appliances is increasing dramatically. The World Health Organization consistently points out that there is a lack of scientific evidence to assess the reproductive risk in female species within the exposure limits as stated by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. The purpose of this review paper is to review the available literature on the effects of IF EMR on female reproduction in all species and to fully understand these effects. A literature review of experimental, epidemiological, in vivo, and in vitro literature from the 1800s to the present was conducted. Very few studies have been conducted on the effects of IF on female reproduction. The study of women in their workplace, laboratory rats and mice, and chicken embryos has yielded conflicting results on the dangers of IF. Some reports consider IF harmful during pregnancy, while other results show an insignificant (p < 0.05) correlation between the exposed group and the unexposed groups. The experiments conducted so far restrict several parameters such as field strength, frequency, and modulation to draw definitive conclusions. In two experiments, this frequency range is considered safe for non-invasive treatment of cancerous and noncancerous ovarian cells in the initial phase. Evaluation of the IF range on reproduction should be a priority for research. This review shows that there are few reports in this field, and they all contradict each other on whether the IF field is harmful or not. Nonetheless, IF is used in medicine to treat cancer and is currently being researched for non-cancerous cells. More comprehensive IF studies should be conducted to address the limitations in these summary studies. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typereview

Effect directionmixed

PopulationFemale species (women; laboratory rats and mice; chicken embryos)

Sample sizeNot supplied

ExposureIF

Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

This review reports that very few studies have examined intermediate frequency (IF) electromagnetic radiation/fields and female reproduction, and the available findings are conflicting. Some reports consider IF harmful during pregnancy, while other results report an insignificant correlation between exposed and unexposed groups. The review notes that existing experiments restrict parameters such as field strength, frequency, and modulation, limiting definitive conclusions; two experiments considered this frequency range safe for initial-phase non-invasive treatment of cancerous and noncancerous ovarian cells.

Outcomes measured

Female reproduction
Pregnancy-related effects
Reproductive risk
Effects on ovarian cells (cancerous and noncancerous)

Limitations

Very few studies available on IF effects on female reproduction
Conflicting results across studies
Experimental parameters (field strength, frequency, modulation) were restricted, limiting definitive conclusions
Frequency, exposure metrics (e.g., field strength/SAR), and exposure durations not specified in the abstract

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "review",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "IF",
    "source": "occupational equipment and domestic appliances; medical use (non-invasive treatment)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Female species (women; laboratory rats and mice; chicken embryos)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Female reproduction",
    "Pregnancy-related effects",
    "Reproductive risk",
    "Effects on ovarian cells (cancerous and noncancerous)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "This review reports that very few studies have examined intermediate frequency (IF) electromagnetic radiation/fields and female reproduction, and the available findings are conflicting. Some reports consider IF harmful during pregnancy, while other results report an insignificant correlation between exposed and unexposed groups. The review notes that existing experiments restrict parameters such as field strength, frequency, and modulation, limiting definitive conclusions; two experiments considered this frequency range safe for initial-phase non-invasive treatment of cancerous and noncancerous ovarian cells.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Very few studies available on IF effects on female reproduction",
    "Conflicting results across studies",
    "Experimental parameters (field strength, frequency, modulation) were restricted, limiting definitive conclusions",
    "Frequency, exposure metrics (e.g., field strength/SAR), and exposure durations not specified in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "intermediate frequency",
    "IF fields",
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "EMR",
    "female reproduction",
    "pregnancy",
    "occupational exposure",
    "domestic appliances",
    "ICNIRP",
    "World Health Organization",
    "ovarian cells",
    "in vivo",
    "in vitro",
    "epidemiology"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.6,
      "reason": "Mentions increasing use of IF fields in occupational equipment and workplace studies."
    },
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.75,
      "reason": "Explicitly references WHO statements and ICNIRP exposure limits."
    }
  ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001516
PubMed: 34999661

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library