No Alteration Between Intrinsic Connectivity Networks by a Pilot Study on Localized Exposure to the Fourth- Generation Wireless Communication Signals (4G)

2022 · No effect · Low evidence

← Research stream
No effectLow evidencePaper 923

In this pilot experiment, paired comparisons found no statistical differences in static or dynamic functional network connectivity between intrinsic connectivity networks after real versus sham 4G (LTE) localized head exposure for 30 minutes. The authors repo…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2022
Study typerandomized_trial
Reported directionNo effect
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

No Alteration Between Intrinsic Connectivity Networks by a Pilot Study on Localized Exposure to the Fourth- Generation Wireless Communication Signals (4G) Yang Lei, Liu Qingmeng, Zhou Yu, Wang Xing, Wu Tongning, Chen Zhiye. No Alteration Between Intrinsic Connectivity Networks by a Pilot Study on Localized Exposure to the Fourth-Generation Wireless Communication Signals. Frontiers in Public Health. Vol 9. 2022. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.734370. Abstract Neurophysiological effect of human exposure to radiofrequency signals has attracted considerable attention, which was claimed to have an association with a series of clinical symptoms. A few investigations have been conducted on alteration of brain functions, yet no known research focused on intrinsic connectivity networks, an attribute that may relate to some behavioral functions. To investigate the exposure effect on functional connectivity between intrinsic connectivity networks, we conducted experiments with seventeen participants experiencing localized head exposure to real and sham time-division long-term evolution signal for 30 min. The resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were collected before and after exposure, respectively. Group-level independent component analysis was used to decompose networks of interest. Three states were clustered, which can reflect different cognitive conditions. Dynamic connectivity as well as conventional connectivity between networks per state were computed and followed by paired sample t-tests. Results showed that there was no statistical difference in static or dynamic functional network connectivity in both real and sham exposure conditions, and pointed out that the impact of short-term electromagnetic exposure was undetected at the ICNs level. The specific brain parcellations and metrics used in the study may lead to different results on brain modulation. Open access paper: frontiersin.org

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typerandomized_trial
Effect directionno_effect
PopulationSeventeen participants undergoing localized head exposure with resting-state fMRI before and after exposure
Sample size17
ExposureRF · 30 min
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In this pilot experiment, paired comparisons found no statistical differences in static or dynamic functional network connectivity between intrinsic connectivity networks after real versus sham 4G (LTE) localized head exposure for 30 minutes. The authors report that short-term electromagnetic exposure effects were undetected at the ICN level under the study conditions.

Outcomes measured

  • Static functional network connectivity between intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs)
  • Dynamic functional network connectivity between ICNs
  • Clustered connectivity states reflecting different cognitive conditions (three states)

Limitations

  • Pilot study with small sample size (n=17)
  • Short-term exposure duration (30 minutes)
  • Findings may depend on specific brain parcellations and metrics used
  • Only intrinsic connectivity network-level measures were assessed (resting-state fMRI)
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "publication_year": null,
  "study_type": "randomized_trial",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "4G mobile signal (LTE) localized head exposure",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "30 min"
  },
  "population": "Seventeen participants undergoing localized head exposure with resting-state fMRI before and after exposure",
  "sample_size": 17,
  "outcomes": [
    "Static functional network connectivity between intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs)",
    "Dynamic functional network connectivity between ICNs",
    "Clustered connectivity states reflecting different cognitive conditions (three states)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In this pilot experiment, paired comparisons found no statistical differences in static or dynamic functional network connectivity between intrinsic connectivity networks after real versus sham 4G (LTE) localized head exposure for 30 minutes. The authors report that short-term electromagnetic exposure effects were undetected at the ICN level under the study conditions.",
  "effect_direction": "no_effect",
  "limitations": [
    "Pilot study with small sample size (n=17)",
    "Short-term exposure duration (30 minutes)",
    "Findings may depend on specific brain parcellations and metrics used",
    "Only intrinsic connectivity network-level measures were assessed (resting-state fMRI)"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "stance": "reassurance",
  "stance_confidence": 0.74,
  "summary": "This pilot study examined whether localized head exposure to a real versus sham 4G (LTE) signal for 30 minutes alters resting-state functional connectivity between intrinsic connectivity networks. Seventeen participants underwent fMRI before and after exposure, and connectivity was analyzed using independent component analysis and state-based dynamic connectivity metrics. The study reports no statistically significant differences in static or dynamic connectivity for real compared with sham exposure.",
  "key_points": [
    "The study investigated intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) using resting-state fMRI before and after exposure.",
    "Seventeen participants received localized head exposure to real and sham LTE (4G) signals for 30 minutes.",
    "Group-level independent component analysis was used to identify networks of interest.",
    "Three connectivity states were clustered and used for dynamic connectivity analyses.",
    "Paired sample t-tests found no statistical differences in static or dynamic connectivity in real versus sham conditions.",
    "Authors note that different brain parcellations and metrics could potentially yield different results."
  ],
  "categories": [
    "RF",
    "Mobile Communications",
    "Neuroimaging",
    "Brain Function"
  ],
  "tags": [
    "4G",
    "LTE",
    "Radiofrequency Exposure",
    "Localized Head Exposure",
    "Resting-State fMRI",
    "Intrinsic Connectivity Networks",
    "Functional Connectivity",
    "Dynamic Connectivity",
    "Sham Exposure",
    "Pilot Study"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "4G",
    "LTE",
    "radiofrequency",
    "electromagnetic exposure",
    "intrinsic connectivity networks",
    "resting-state fMRI",
    "functional connectivity",
    "dynamic connectivity",
    "sham"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "cell-phones",
      "weight": 0.78,
      "reason": "Study evaluates localized head exposure to a 4G (LTE) wireless communication signal, relevant to mobile phone-type RF exposure."
    }
  ],
  "social": {
    "tweet": "Pilot fMRI study (n=17) found no significant changes in static or dynamic connectivity between intrinsic connectivity networks after 30 min localized head exposure to real vs sham 4G (LTE) signals.",
    "facebook": "A pilot resting-state fMRI study with 17 participants reported no statistically significant differences in static or dynamic functional connectivity between intrinsic connectivity networks after 30 minutes of localized head exposure to real versus sham 4G (LTE) signals.",
    "linkedin": "Frontiers in Public Health pilot study (n=17) used resting-state fMRI and ICA-based network analysis to test localized 4G (LTE) head exposure for 30 minutes; no significant differences were reported in static or dynamic connectivity between intrinsic connectivity networks versus sham."
  }
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.734370
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library