Editorial: Human Exposure to New-Emerging Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields

2022 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 798

Editorial describing increased complexity of human exposure to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields with advancing wireless technologies/devices, and noting that recent studies and revised international safety guidelines/standards may enhance knowle…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2022
Study typeother
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Editorial: Human Exposure to New-Emerging Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields Wu Tongning, Peng Ruiyun, Zhang Lei, Li Kun. Editorial: Human Exposure to New-Emerging Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.894624. No abstract With the advancement of wireless technologies and electronic/electrical devices, humans are exposed to more complicated electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (EMF), which has raised public concerns on potential health effects. Researchers have recently conducted a series of studies on diverse exposure scenarios. In addition, international standard organizations have revised safety guidelines and standards (1). These recent results and practices can enhance our knowledge in assessing health risks from the exposure to EMF (2). This Research Topic consists of 14 articles (one review article, two brief research report articles, and 11 original research articles) published in the Radiation and Health section of Frontiers in Public Health.... Open access paper: frontiersin.org View all 15 papers: frontiersin.org electric-magnetic-and-electromagnetic-fields#articles Paternal Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure Causes Sex-Specific Differences in Body Weight Trajectory and Glucose Metabolism in Offspring Mice Yan Song, Ju Ying, Dong Jie, Lei Hui, Wang Jun, Xu Qian, Ma Yefei, Wang Jingjing, Wang Xiaohong. Paternal Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure Causes Sex-Specific Differences in Body Weight Trajectory and Glucose Metabolism in Offspring Mice. Frontiers in Public Health. 10, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.872198. Abstract Nowadays, concerns about the harmful effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) on male fertility and offspring health are growing. In the present study, we investigated the effects of long-term exposure (at least 10 weeks) to the RF-EMR [2.0 GHz; power density, 2.5 W/m2; whole-body specific absorption rate (SAR), 0.125–0.5 W/kg] on male mice fertility and F1 growth and glucose metabolism. No significant injuries were observed in testis organization, sperm quality, and pregnancy rate. However, mice exposed to RF-EMR exhibited a significantly elevated apoptosis rate in testis germ cells. Interestingly, paternal RF-EMR exposure resulted in sex-specific weight trajectory differences and glucose metabolism changes in male F1 mice but not in female F1 mice. The changed glucose metabolism in F1 male may result from the altered gene expression of liver Gck. These data collectively suggested that 2.0 GHz RF-EMR whole-body exposure of male mice does not cause obvious impairment in testis, sperm quality, and pregnancy rate. Paternal RF-EMR exposure causes male- specific alterations in body weight trajectories and glucose metabolism of F1. Open access paper: frontiersin.org Measurement and Exposure Assessment of Intermediate Frequency Magnetic Fields From Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) Gates in Libraries Ikuyo Miwa, Esaki Kaoru, Aimoto Atsuko, Wake Kanako, Yamaguchi-Sekino Sachiko, Kojimahara Noriko, Suzuki Yukihisa, Taki Masao. Measurement and Exposure Assessment of Intermediate Frequency Magnetic Fields From Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) Gates in Libraries. Frontiers in Public Health. 10, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.871134. Abstract Exposure to magnetic fields from the electronic article surveillance (EAS) gate was evaluated in consideration of the application to epidemiological studies of library workers who are exposed continually to intermediate frequency magnetic fields from the EAS gate. Two types of exposures were investigated. One was transient exposure due to passing through or beside the gate and another was chronic exposure in the room. We measured magnetic fields from five EAS gate models which were commonly used in libraries in Japan. Detailed measurements were performed for two of them in consideration of the phase difference of vector components of magnetic flux density. The polarization of the magnetic field in the gate was investigated with the index of ellipticity. The induced electric field in a human body was numerically calculated for exposures to magnetic fields of the two gate models. The results provide a quantitative understanding of exposures during passing through or by the EAS gate. Magnetic field distribution was measured in a large room for one gate model to quantify the chronic exposure of library workers during the work at the desk. It was found that the magnetic field was distributed as a function of the horizontal distance to the nearest gatepost. The 45-point average value BIEC defined by the IEC standard was suggested to be a useful quantity to characterize the magnitude of the magnetic field from the EAS gate. Exposures to different EAS gates are expected to be compared through this quantity without detailed measurements. These results are expected to provide useful means for exposure assessment of epidemiological studies on the association between the IF-EMF exposure and possible health outcomes. Open access paper: frontiersin.org

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 62% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Editorial describing increased complexity of human exposure to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields with advancing wireless technologies/devices, and noting that recent studies and revised international safety guidelines/standards may enhance knowledge for EMF health risk assessment. It summarizes a Research Topic consisting of multiple articles.

Limitations

  • No study methods, exposure metrics, sample size, or outcome results are provided (editorial/no abstract).
  • Content is a high-level overview of a Research Topic rather than primary empirical findings.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "new-emerging electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (general)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [],
  "main_findings": "Editorial describing increased complexity of human exposure to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields with advancing wireless technologies/devices, and noting that recent studies and revised international safety guidelines/standards may enhance knowledge for EMF health risk assessment. It summarizes a Research Topic consisting of multiple articles.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No study methods, exposure metrics, sample size, or outcome results are provided (editorial/no abstract).",
    "Content is a high-level overview of a Research Topic rather than primary empirical findings."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.62,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "editorial",
    "human exposure",
    "electric fields",
    "magnetic fields",
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "wireless technologies",
    "safety guidelines",
    "standards",
    "risk assessment"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.894624
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library