Road User Exposure from ITS-5.9 GHz Vehicular Connectivity
← Research streamUsing computational dosimetry for a 3D car model with two V2V antennas (each fed with 1 W) at 5.9 GHz and an adult human model nearby, the highest SAR was in the skin of the head (34.7 mW/kg) and eyes (15 mW/kg). SAR in torso (including genitals) and limbs wa…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Road User Exposure from ITS-5.9 GHz Vehicular Connectivity Benini M, Parazzini M, Bonato M, Gallucci S, Chiaramello E, Fiocchi S, Tognola G. Road User Exposure from ITS- 5.9 GHz Vehicular Connectivity. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 15;22(18):6986. doi: 10.3390/s22186986. Abstract This study addressed an important but not yet thoroughly investigated topic regarding human exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) generated by vehicular connectivity. In particular, the study assessed, by means of computational dosimetry, the RF-EMF exposure in road users near a car equipped with vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication antennas. The exposure scenario consisted of a 3D numerical model of a car with two V2V antennas, each fed with 1 W, operating at 5.9 GHz and an adult human model to simulate the road user near the car. The RF-EMF dose absorbed by the human model was calculated as the specific absorption rate (SAR), that is, the RF-EMF power absorbed per unit of mass. The highest SAR was observed in the skin of the head (34.7 mW/kg) and in the eyes (15 mW/kg); the SAR at the torso (including the genitals) and limbs was negligible or much lower than in the head and eyes. The SAR over the whole body was 0.19 mW/kg. The SAR was always well below the limits of human exposure in the 100 kHz-6 GHz band established by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The proposed approach can be generalized to assess RF-EMF exposure in different conditions by varying the montage/number of V2V antennas and considering human models of different ages. Open access paper: mdpi.com
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Using computational dosimetry for a 3D car model with two V2V antennas (each fed with 1 W) at 5.9 GHz and an adult human model nearby, the highest SAR was in the skin of the head (34.7 mW/kg) and eyes (15 mW/kg). SAR in torso (including genitals) and limbs was negligible or much lower; whole-body SAR was 0.19 mW/kg. SAR values were reported as well below ICNIRP limits for 100 kHz–6 GHz.
Outcomes measured
- Specific absorption rate (SAR) in tissues (skin of head, eyes, torso/genitals, limbs)
- Whole-body SAR
- Comparison to ICNIRP exposure limits (100 kHz–6 GHz)
Limitations
- Computational dosimetry/modeling study (no direct measurements in humans)
- Scenario limited to a specific 3D car model with two antennas fed with 1 W at 5.9 GHz
- Only an adult human model was used in the described scenario
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "exposure_assessment",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) vehicular connectivity antennas",
"frequency_mhz": 5900,
"sar_wkg": 0.0347,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Adult human model (computational) representing a road user near a car",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Specific absorption rate (SAR) in tissues (skin of head, eyes, torso/genitals, limbs)",
"Whole-body SAR",
"Comparison to ICNIRP exposure limits (100 kHz–6 GHz)"
],
"main_findings": "Using computational dosimetry for a 3D car model with two V2V antennas (each fed with 1 W) at 5.9 GHz and an adult human model nearby, the highest SAR was in the skin of the head (34.7 mW/kg) and eyes (15 mW/kg). SAR in torso (including genitals) and limbs was negligible or much lower; whole-body SAR was 0.19 mW/kg. SAR values were reported as well below ICNIRP limits for 100 kHz–6 GHz.",
"effect_direction": "no_effect",
"limitations": [
"Computational dosimetry/modeling study (no direct measurements in humans)",
"Scenario limited to a specific 3D car model with two antennas fed with 1 W at 5.9 GHz",
"Only an adult human model was used in the described scenario"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.78,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"RF-EMF",
"vehicular connectivity",
"V2V",
"ITS 5.9 GHz",
"computational dosimetry",
"SAR",
"road user exposure",
"ICNIRP"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.28,
"reason": "Assesses RF-EMF exposure scenario for road users near connected vehicles; could be relevant to workers/roadside personnel though not explicitly stated."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.3390/s22186986
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions (ICBE-EMF review) 2023
- Analyses of some call factors affecting SAR levels of GSM mobile phones used in Ghana 2022
- Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G 2022
- It is mandatory to review environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurement protocols and exposure regulations: An opinion article 2022
- Half Duplex Radio: Towards Green 5G NR Half Duplex Radio: Towards Green 5G NR 2020
- Radio Frequency Exposure in Military Contexts: A Narrative Review of Thermal Effects and Safety Considerations 2025