Biological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields above 100 MHz on Fauna and Flora: Workshop Report
← Research streamWorkshop report summarizing evidence on anthropogenic RF-EMF exposures above 100 MHz in flora and fauna. It states that for frequencies exceeding 100 MHz, the only scientifically established action mechanism in organisms is conversion of electromagnetic energ…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Biological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields above 100 MHz on Fauna and Flora: Workshop Report Pophof B, Henschenmacher B, Kattnig DR, Kuhne J, Vian A, Ziegelberger G. Biological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields above 100 MHz on Fauna and Flora: Workshop Report. Health Phys. 2023 Jan 1;124(1):31-38. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001625. Abstract This report summarizes the effects of anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields with frequencies above 100 MHz on flora and fauna presented at an international workshop held on 5-7 November 2019 in Munich, Germany. Anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields at these frequencies are commonplace; e.g., originating from transmitters used for terrestrial radio and TV broadcasting, mobile communication, wireless internet networks, and radar technologies. The effects of these radiofrequency fields on flora, fauna, and ecosystems are not well studied. For high frequencies exceeding 100 MHz, the only scientifically established action mechanism in organisms is the conversion of electromagnetic into thermal energy. In accordance with that, no proven scientific evidence of adverse effects in animals or plants under realistic environmental conditions has yet been identified from exposure to low-level anthropogenic radiofrequency fields in this frequency range. Because appropriate field studies are scarce, further studies on plants and animals are recommended. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Workshop report summarizing evidence on anthropogenic RF-EMF exposures above 100 MHz in flora and fauna. It states that for frequencies exceeding 100 MHz, the only scientifically established action mechanism in organisms is conversion of electromagnetic energy into thermal energy, and that no proven scientific evidence of adverse effects under realistic environmental conditions has yet been identified for low-level anthropogenic RF fields in this frequency range; it notes field studies are scarce and recommends further studies.
Outcomes measured
- biological effects on flora
- biological effects on fauna
- ecosystem effects
- adverse effects under realistic environmental conditions
- mechanisms of action (thermal conversion)
Limitations
- Report notes that effects on flora, fauna, and ecosystems are not well studied
- Appropriate field studies are scarce
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "review",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "terrestrial radio and TV broadcasting; mobile communication; wireless internet networks; radar technologies",
"frequency_mhz": 100,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "flora and fauna",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"biological effects on flora",
"biological effects on fauna",
"ecosystem effects",
"adverse effects under realistic environmental conditions",
"mechanisms of action (thermal conversion)"
],
"main_findings": "Workshop report summarizing evidence on anthropogenic RF-EMF exposures above 100 MHz in flora and fauna. It states that for frequencies exceeding 100 MHz, the only scientifically established action mechanism in organisms is conversion of electromagnetic energy into thermal energy, and that no proven scientific evidence of adverse effects under realistic environmental conditions has yet been identified for low-level anthropogenic RF fields in this frequency range; it notes field studies are scarce and recommends further studies.",
"effect_direction": "no_effect",
"limitations": [
"Report notes that effects on flora, fauna, and ecosystems are not well studied",
"Appropriate field studies are scarce"
],
"evidence_strength": "insufficient",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"radiofrequency electromagnetic fields",
"RF-EMF",
"above 100 MHz",
"flora",
"fauna",
"ecosystems",
"environmental exposure",
"thermal mechanism",
"workshop report"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "who-icnirp",
"weight": 0.55,
"reason": "Includes an author (Ziegelberger) associated with RF exposure assessment/policy discussions; workshop-style synthesis relevant to guideline context."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001625
PubMed: 36480583
Related papers
- Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure and the Resting EEG: Exploring the Thermal Mechanism Hypothesis 2019
- Estimates of Environmental Exposure to RF EMF and Risk of Lymphoma Subtypes 2018
- Assessing RF EMF exposure in multiple microenvironments across ten European countries with a focus on 5G 2025
- Effects of everyday radiofrequency electromagnetic-field exposure on sleep quality: a cross-sectional study. 2010
- Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and sleep quality: a prospective cohort study. 2012
- Prediction of RF-EMF exposure levels in large outdoor areas through car-mounted measurements on the enveloping roads. 2016