Case Report: The Microwave Syndrome after Installation of 5G Emphasizes the Need for Protection from Radiofrequency Radiation

2023 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 587

The report describes two individuals who developed symptoms described as “microwave syndrome” shortly after installation of a 5G base station above their apartment, alongside measured increases in peak RF radiation levels in the bedroom compared with pre-5G m…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2023
Study typecase_report
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Case Report: The Microwave Syndrome after Installation of 5G Emphasizes the Need for Protection from Radiofrequency Radiation Hardell L, Nilsson M. (2023). Case Report: The Microwave Syndrome after Installation of 5G Emphasizes the Need for Protection from Radiofrequency Radiation. Ann Case Report. 8: 1112. doi: 10.29011/2574- 7754.101112. Abstract In this case report two previously healthy persons, a man aged 63 years and a woman aged 62 years, developed symptoms of the microwave syndrome after installation of a 5G base station for wireless communication on the roof above their apartment. A base station for previous telecommunication generation technology (3G/4G) was present at the same spot since several years. Very high radiofrequency (RF) radiation with maximum (highest measured peak value) levels of 354 000, 1 690 000, and >2 500 000 µW/m2 were measured at three occasions in the bedroom located only 5 meters below the new 5G base station, compared to maximum (peak) 9 000 µW/m2 prior to the 5G deployment. The rapidly emerging symptoms after the 5G deployment were typical for the microwave syndrome with e.g., neurological symptoms, tinnitus, fatigue, insomnia, emotional distress, skin disorders, and blood pressure variability. The symptoms were more pronounced in the woman. Due to the severity of symptoms, the couple left their dwelling and moved to a small office room with maximum (peak) RF radiation 3 500 µW/m2. Within a couple of days, most of their symptoms alleviated or disappeared completely. This medical history can be regarded as a classic provocation test. The RF radiation levels in the apartment were well below the limit proposed to be “safe” below which no health effects would occur, recommended by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation (ICNIRP). These now presented symptoms of the microwave syndrome were caused by non-thermal effects from RF radiation and highlight that the ICNIRP guidelines used in most countries including Sweden do not protect human health. Guidelines based on all biological negative effects from RF radiation are urgently needed, as well as monitoring human health, not the least due to rapidly increasing levels of exposure. Open access paper: gavinpublishers.com installation-of-5g-emphasizes-the-need-for-protection-from-radiofrequency-radiation

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typecase_report
Effect directionharm
PopulationTwo previously healthy adults (man aged 63 years; woman aged 62 years) living in an apartment 5 meters below a newly installed 5G base station.
Sample size2
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

The report describes two individuals who developed symptoms described as “microwave syndrome” shortly after installation of a 5G base station above their apartment, alongside measured increases in peak RF radiation levels in the bedroom compared with pre-5G measurements. After moving to a location reported to have lower peak RF radiation, most symptoms reportedly alleviated or disappeared within a couple of days. The authors interpret this as a provocation test and attribute symptoms to non-thermal RF effects, arguing ICNIRP-based limits are not protective.

Outcomes measured

  • Microwave syndrome symptoms (neurological symptoms, tinnitus, fatigue, insomnia, emotional distress, skin disorders, blood pressure variability)
  • Symptom change after leaving the apartment / moving to lower RF environment

Limitations

  • Case report with only two individuals; no control group.
  • Causality cannot be established from temporal association alone.
  • No blinding; outcomes are symptom-based and may be subject to reporting/expectation effects.
  • Frequency details and measurement methodology are not described in the abstract.
  • Potential confounders (other environmental changes, stress, relocation effects) are not detailed in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "publication_year": 2023,
  "study_type": "case_report",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "base station",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Two previously healthy adults (man aged 63 years; woman aged 62 years) living in an apartment 5 meters below a newly installed 5G base station.",
  "sample_size": 2,
  "outcomes": [
    "Microwave syndrome symptoms (neurological symptoms, tinnitus, fatigue, insomnia, emotional distress, skin disorders, blood pressure variability)",
    "Symptom change after leaving the apartment / moving to lower RF environment"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The report describes two individuals who developed symptoms described as “microwave syndrome” shortly after installation of a 5G base station above their apartment, alongside measured increases in peak RF radiation levels in the bedroom compared with pre-5G measurements. After moving to a location reported to have lower peak RF radiation, most symptoms reportedly alleviated or disappeared within a couple of days. The authors interpret this as a provocation test and attribute symptoms to non-thermal RF effects, arguing ICNIRP-based limits are not protective.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "Case report with only two individuals; no control group.",
    "Causality cannot be established from temporal association alone.",
    "No blinding; outcomes are symptom-based and may be subject to reporting/expectation effects.",
    "Frequency details and measurement methodology are not described in the abstract.",
    "Potential confounders (other environmental changes, stress, relocation effects) are not detailed in the abstract."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "stance": "concern",
  "stance_confidence": 0.9,
  "summary": "This case report describes two previously healthy adults who reportedly developed symptoms labeled as “microwave syndrome” after installation of a 5G base station on the roof above their apartment. Peak RF radiation measurements in the bedroom were reported to be substantially higher after 5G deployment than prior measurements. After leaving the apartment and moving to a lower-RF location, most symptoms reportedly improved within days. The authors argue the symptoms reflect non-thermal RF effects and that ICNIRP-based limits are not sufficiently protective.",
  "key_points": [
    "Two adults (63-year-old man and 62-year-old woman) reportedly developed symptoms soon after a 5G base station was installed above their apartment.",
    "A 3G/4G base station had been present at the same location for years prior to the 5G installation.",
    "The abstract reports much higher peak RF radiation measurements in the bedroom after 5G deployment compared with pre-5G measurements.",
    "Reported symptoms included neurological symptoms, tinnitus, fatigue, insomnia, emotional distress, skin disorders, and blood pressure variability.",
    "Symptoms were reported as more pronounced in the woman.",
    "After relocating to a lower-RF environment, most symptoms reportedly alleviated or disappeared within a couple of days.",
    "The authors interpret the history as a provocation test and attribute effects to non-thermal RF exposure.",
    "The authors state that ICNIRP guideline-based limits did not prevent these reported symptoms and call for new guidelines."
  ],
  "categories": [
    "5G",
    "Radiofrequency (RF)",
    "Base Stations",
    "Clinical Reports",
    "Exposure Assessment"
  ],
  "tags": [
    "5G Base Station",
    "Microwave Syndrome",
    "Radiofrequency Radiation",
    "Provocation Test",
    "Non-Thermal Effects",
    "ICNIRP Guidelines",
    "Apartment Exposure",
    "Symptom Improvement After Relocation",
    "Tinnitus",
    "Insomnia",
    "Fatigue",
    "Neurological Symptoms",
    "Skin Disorders",
    "Blood Pressure Variability"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "case report",
    "5G",
    "base station",
    "radiofrequency",
    "microwave syndrome",
    "ICNIRP",
    "non-thermal",
    "provocation test",
    "tinnitus",
    "insomnia",
    "fatigue"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "5g-policy",
      "weight": 0.86,
      "reason": "Focuses on 5G base station exposure and argues for changes to protection guidelines."
    },
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.84,
      "reason": "Explicit critique of ICNIRP guideline adequacy is central to the abstract."
    }
  ],
  "social": {
    "tweet": "Case report (n=2) describes symptom onset after a 5G base station was installed above an apartment, with higher reported peak RF measurements and symptom improvement after relocation. Authors attribute effects to non-thermal RF and argue ICNIRP limits are not protective.",
    "facebook": "A 2023 case report describes two adults who reported developing “microwave syndrome” symptoms after a 5G base station was installed above their apartment, alongside higher reported peak RF measurements. After moving to a lower-RF location, most symptoms reportedly improved within days; the authors argue this indicates non-thermal RF effects and that ICNIRP-based limits are insufficient.",
    "linkedin": "This 2023 case report (two individuals) reports symptom onset after installation of a 5G base station above an apartment, with higher reported peak RF measurements and symptom improvement after relocation. The authors interpret the history as a provocation test and argue current ICNIRP-based exposure limits may not be protective."
  }
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.29011/2574
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library