Assessment and Categorization of Biological Effects and Atypical Symptoms Owing to Exposure to RF Fields from Wireless Energy Devices
← Research streamThe article reviews and discusses reported consequences of non-ionizing RF fields from wireless devices, including biological effects in living tissues, atypical personal symptoms, and indirect effects on healthcare appliances, and discusses methodologies for…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Assessment and Categorization of Biological Effects and Atypical Symptoms Owing to Exposure to RF Fields from Wireless Energy Devices Razek A. Assessment and Categorization of Biological Effects and Atypical Symptoms Owing to Exposure to RF Fields from Wireless Energy Devices. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(3):1265. doi: 10.3390/app13031265. Abstract Nowadays, environmental electromagnetic fields exist everywhere and the whole population is exposed. The most widespread technologies engendering exposure to electromagnetic fields for the public and workers are radiofrequency wireless communication systems. Such exposure can have direct effects on living tissue involving biological problems or personal symptoms, as well as indirect effects restricting healthcare appliances. This assessment aims to analyze, examine and categorize the consequences of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields emitted by radiofrequency devices. This concerns biological effects in living tissues and atypical personal symptoms for short and long-term exposures. The evaluation methodology in this field of investigation is also discussed. In the article, these consequences as well as their evaluation techniques, in the case of wireless digital communication tools, are analyzed and reviewed. The categorization of exposure sources, the corresponding effects and their assessment methodologies are analyzed. The concept of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and their applications in various assessments of these effects and symptoms are reviewed and discussed. Open access paper: mdpi.com
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
The article reviews and discusses reported consequences of non-ionizing RF fields from wireless devices, including biological effects in living tissues, atypical personal symptoms, and indirect effects on healthcare appliances, and discusses methodologies for evaluating and categorizing exposure sources and effects.
Outcomes measured
- biological effects in living tissues
- atypical personal symptoms
- indirect effects restricting healthcare appliances
- exposure source categorization
- assessment methodologies
- evaluation techniques
- systematic reviews and meta-analyses (concepts and applications)
Limitations
- No specific exposure metrics (e.g., frequency, SAR) reported in the abstract
- No specific study designs, included studies, or quantitative results described in the abstract
- No sample size or population details beyond broad categories (public/workers)
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "review",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "radiofrequency wireless communication systems / wireless digital communication tools / RF devices",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "short and long-term exposures"
},
"population": "whole population (public) and workers",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"biological effects in living tissues",
"atypical personal symptoms",
"indirect effects restricting healthcare appliances",
"exposure source categorization",
"assessment methodologies",
"evaluation techniques",
"systematic reviews and meta-analyses (concepts and applications)"
],
"main_findings": "The article reviews and discusses reported consequences of non-ionizing RF fields from wireless devices, including biological effects in living tissues, atypical personal symptoms, and indirect effects on healthcare appliances, and discusses methodologies for evaluating and categorizing exposure sources and effects.",
"effect_direction": "unclear",
"limitations": [
"No specific exposure metrics (e.g., frequency, SAR) reported in the abstract",
"No specific study designs, included studies, or quantitative results described in the abstract",
"No sample size or population details beyond broad categories (public/workers)"
],
"evidence_strength": "insufficient",
"confidence": 0.66,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"radiofrequency",
"non-ionizing electromagnetic fields",
"wireless communication systems",
"wireless digital communication tools",
"biological effects",
"atypical symptoms",
"exposure assessment",
"systematic reviews",
"meta-analyses"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.42,
"reason": "Abstract explicitly mentions exposure for public and workers."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.3390/app13031265
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- Epidemiological criteria for causation applied to human health harms from RF-EMF exposure: Bradford Hill revisited 2025
- Cellular and molecular effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields 2023
- Specific Absorption Rate Variability in Long Term Exposure In Vivo Experiments 2023
- Wireless technologies, non-ionizing electromagnetic fields and children: Identifying and reducing health risks 2023
- Low-level EMF effects on wildlife and plants: What research tells us about an ecosystem approach 2022
- Biological Effects of Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Fields at 27 GHz on Sperm Quality of Mytilus galloprovincialis 2022