Prevalence of Migraine Disease in Electrohypersensitive Patients
← Research streamAmong 293 EHS patients (97% women; mean age 57 ± 12 years), migraine was diagnosed in 65% (N=191; 95% CI: 60–71%) using the extended French ID Migraine questionnaire. All 12 assessed symptoms were reported as higher intensity in migraineurs than non-migraineu…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Prevalence of Migraine Disease in Electrohypersensitive Patients Greco F, Garnier O, Macioce V, Picot MC. Prevalence of Migraine Disease in Electrohypersensitive Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(12):4092. doi.org Abstract Background: The vast majority of electrohypersensitive (EHS) patients present headaches on contact with an electromagnetic source. Clinical features suggest that the headaches of these patients could be a variant of the migraine disease and could be treated as such. We aimed to assess the prevalence of migraine disease in EHS patients using a validated questionnaire. Methods: Patients with EHS defined according to WHO criteria were contacted through EHS patient support associations. They were required to answer a self-questionnaire including clinical data and the extended French version of the ID Migraine questionnaire (ef-ID Migraine) to screen for the migraine disease. Migraine prevalence and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Patients’ characteristics, symptoms (rheumatology, digestive, cognitive, respiratory, cardiac, mood, cutaneous, headache, perception, genital, tinnitus and tiredness) and impact on daily life were compared between migraineur and non-migraineur patients. Results: A total of 293 patients were included (97% women, mean age 57 ± 12 years). Migraine was diagnosed in 65% (N = 191; 95% CI: 60–71%) with the ef-ID Migraine. The migraine diagnosis was accompanied by nausea/vomiting in 50% of cases, photophobia in 69% or visual disturbances in 38%. All of the 12 symptoms assessed were of higher intensity in migraineurs than in non-migraineurs. The symptoms prevented social life in 88% of migraineurs and 75% of non-migraineurs (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Our work encourages us to consider the headaches of these patients as a possible variant of the migraine disease and, possibly, to manage them according to the current recommendations. mdpi.com
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Among 293 EHS patients (97% women; mean age 57 ± 12 years), migraine was diagnosed in 65% (N=191; 95% CI: 60–71%) using the extended French ID Migraine questionnaire. All 12 assessed symptoms were reported as higher intensity in migraineurs than non-migraineurs, and symptoms prevented social life in 88% of migraineurs vs 75% of non-migraineurs (p < 0.01).
Outcomes measured
- Prevalence of migraine disease (screened/diagnosed via ef-ID Migraine questionnaire)
- Associated migraine features (nausea/vomiting, photophobia, visual disturbances)
- Symptom intensity across 12 symptom domains
- Impact on daily life/social life
Limitations
- Participants were recruited via EHS patient support associations (potential selection bias)
- Migraine status was assessed using a self-questionnaire screening tool (ef-ID Migraine) rather than clinical diagnosis
- Electromagnetic exposure characteristics (frequency, intensity, duration, specific sources) were not specified in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "cross_sectional",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": "electromagnetic source (unspecified)",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Electrohypersensitive (EHS) patients defined according to WHO criteria, contacted through EHS patient support associations",
"sample_size": 293,
"outcomes": [
"Prevalence of migraine disease (screened/diagnosed via ef-ID Migraine questionnaire)",
"Associated migraine features (nausea/vomiting, photophobia, visual disturbances)",
"Symptom intensity across 12 symptom domains",
"Impact on daily life/social life"
],
"main_findings": "Among 293 EHS patients (97% women; mean age 57 ± 12 years), migraine was diagnosed in 65% (N=191; 95% CI: 60–71%) using the extended French ID Migraine questionnaire. All 12 assessed symptoms were reported as higher intensity in migraineurs than non-migraineurs, and symptoms prevented social life in 88% of migraineurs vs 75% of non-migraineurs (p < 0.01).",
"effect_direction": "unclear",
"limitations": [
"Participants were recruited via EHS patient support associations (potential selection bias)",
"Migraine status was assessed using a self-questionnaire screening tool (ef-ID Migraine) rather than clinical diagnosis",
"Electromagnetic exposure characteristics (frequency, intensity, duration, specific sources) were not specified in the abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"electrohypersensitivity",
"EHS",
"migraine",
"headache",
"questionnaire",
"ef-ID Migraine",
"prevalence",
"WHO criteria"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12124092
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- The enigma of headaches associated with electromagnetic hyperfrequencies: Hypotheses supporting non- psychogenic algogenic processes. 2020
- Which sources of electromagnetic field are of the highest concern for electrosensitive individuals? - Questionnaire study with a literature review 2020
- The Effects of Exposure to Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Treatment of Migraine Headache: A Cohort Study. 2016
- Molecular biomarkers in Electrohypersensitivity and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: How They Can 2024
- Wireless radiation and health: making the case for proteomics research of individual sensitivity 2024
- Why the psychogenic or psychosomatic theories for electrohypersensitivity causality should be abandoned, but not the hypothesis of a nocebo-associated symptom formation caused by EMF conditioning in some patients 2022