Human exposure to 5G systems: experimental analysis and measurement issues in FR1 and FR2 operating bands

2023 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 414

Across 5G-related measurement campaigns in Austria, Italy, and Malaysia, the analyses met EMF exposure regulations (including ICNIRP and IEEE). The authors report complex measurement issues that increased uncertainty and variability of measured data in both F…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2023
Study typeexposure_assessment
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Human exposure to 5G systems: experimental analysis and measurement issues in FR1 and FR2 operating bands G. Betta et al. Human exposure to 5G systems: experimental analysis and measurement issues in FR1 and FR2 operating bands. 2023 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2023, pp. 01-06, doi: 10.1109/I2MTC53148.2023.10176034. Abstract This paper provides an overview of the EMF exposure assessment issues identified in the 5G-related measurement campaigns conducted in three different countries (Austria, Italy, and Malaysia). The research presented here results from both short and long-term experimental analyses in the 5G-frequency ranges (i.e. FR1 and FR2). Even though conducted analysis meets the EMF exposure regulations, such as the ones from ICNIRP and IEEE, some of the complex issues resulted in increased measurement uncertainty and variability of the obtained data in both frequency ranges, thus highlighting the crucial role of the measurement procedures and of measurement set-ups for reliably estimating EMF human exposure to 5G systems. The achieved results could be of particular interest to researchers and technical committees involved in standardizing and refining measurement methods and procedures, to make them effectively applicable in most practical situations. ieeexplore.ieee.org

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · both short and long-term experimental analyses
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: unknown

Main findings

Across 5G-related measurement campaigns in Austria, Italy, and Malaysia, the analyses met EMF exposure regulations (including ICNIRP and IEEE). The authors report complex measurement issues that increased uncertainty and variability of measured data in both FR1 and FR2, emphasizing the importance of measurement procedures and set-ups for reliable exposure estimation.

Outcomes measured

  • EMF exposure assessment issues in 5G measurement campaigns
  • measurement uncertainty and variability in FR1 and FR2
  • compliance with EMF exposure regulations (ICNIRP, IEEE)
  • measurement procedures and set-ups for estimating human exposure
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "5G systems",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "both short and long-term experimental analyses"
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "EMF exposure assessment issues in 5G measurement campaigns",
    "measurement uncertainty and variability in FR1 and FR2",
    "compliance with EMF exposure regulations (ICNIRP, IEEE)",
    "measurement procedures and set-ups for estimating human exposure"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Across 5G-related measurement campaigns in Austria, Italy, and Malaysia, the analyses met EMF exposure regulations (including ICNIRP and IEEE). The authors report complex measurement issues that increased uncertainty and variability of measured data in both FR1 and FR2, emphasizing the importance of measurement procedures and set-ups for reliable exposure estimation.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
  "keywords": [
    "5G",
    "human exposure",
    "EMF",
    "exposure assessment",
    "measurement campaigns",
    "FR1",
    "FR2",
    "measurement uncertainty",
    "ICNIRP",
    "IEEE",
    "standardization"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.6,
      "reason": "Abstract explicitly references ICNIRP (and IEEE) exposure regulations in the context of 5G measurements."
    },
    {
      "slug": "5g-policy",
      "weight": 0.45,
      "reason": "Focuses on 5G exposure assessment and measurement methods relevant to regulatory/standards discussions."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1109/i2mtc53148.2023.10176034
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library