Extremely low-frequency EMF facilitate both osteoblast and osteoclast activity through Wnt/β-

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · 2024 · Benefit · Low evidence

← Research stream
BenefitLow evidencePaper 257

In a zebrafish scale fracture model, exposure to 10 mT ELF-EMF at 60 Hz increased the number of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the fractured scale, while 3 or 30 mT did not. Exposure to 10 mT upregulated wnt10b and Wnt target genes and enhanced β-catenin…

Study snapshot

PublicationFrontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · 2024
Study typeanimal
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Extremely low-frequency EMF facilitate both osteoblast and osteoclast activity through Wnt/β- catenin signaling in the zebrafish scale Kobayashi-Sun J, Kobayashi I, Kashima M, Hirayama J, Kakikawa M, Yamada S, Suzuki N. Extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields facilitate both osteoblast and osteoclast activity through Wnt/β- catenin signaling in the zebrafish scale. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Feb 7;12:1340089. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1340089. Abstract Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have received widespread attention as effective, noninvasive, and safe therapies across a range of clinical applications for bone disorders. However, due to the various frequencies of devices, their effects on tissues/cells are vary, which has been a bottleneck in understanding the effects of EMFs on bone tissue. Here, we developed an in vivo model system using zebrafish scales to investigate the effects of extremely low-frequency EMFs (ELF-EMFs) on fracture healing. Exposure to 10 millitesla (mT) of ELF-EMFs at 60 Hz increased the number of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the fractured scale, whereas 3 or 30 mT did not. Gene expression analysis revealed that exposure to 10 mT ELF-EMFs upregulated wnt10b and Wnt target genes in the fractured scale. Moreover, β-catenin expression was enhanced by ELF-EMFs predominantly at the fracture site of the zebrafish scale. Inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by IWR-1-endo treatment reduced both osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the fractured scale exposed to ELF-EMFs. These results suggest that ELF- EMFs promote both osteoblast and osteoclast activity through activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in fracture healing. Our data provide in vivo evidence that ELF-EMFs generated with a widely used commercial AC power supply have a facilitative effect on fracture healing. Open access paper: frontiersin.org

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationZebrafish (scale fracture model)
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureELF
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In a zebrafish scale fracture model, exposure to 10 mT ELF-EMF at 60 Hz increased the number of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the fractured scale, while 3 or 30 mT did not. Exposure to 10 mT upregulated wnt10b and Wnt target genes and enhanced β-catenin expression at the fracture site; inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin signaling (IWR-1-endo) reduced osteoblasts and osteoclasts under ELF-EMF exposure.

Outcomes measured

  • Osteoblast number/activity in fractured scale
  • Osteoclast number/activity in fractured scale
  • Gene expression (wnt10b; Wnt target genes) in fractured scale
  • β-catenin expression at fracture site
  • Effect of Wnt/β-catenin inhibition (IWR-1-endo) on osteoblasts/osteoclasts under ELF-EMF exposure
  • Fracture healing (facilitative effect; in vivo evidence)

Limitations

  • Exposure duration not reported in abstract
  • Sample size not reported in abstract
  • Animal model (zebrafish scales); generalizability to humans not addressed in abstract
  • Only specific field strengths tested (3, 10, 30 mT) and one frequency (60 Hz)
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "commercial AC power supply",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Zebrafish (scale fracture model)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Osteoblast number/activity in fractured scale",
    "Osteoclast number/activity in fractured scale",
    "Gene expression (wnt10b; Wnt target genes) in fractured scale",
    "β-catenin expression at fracture site",
    "Effect of Wnt/β-catenin inhibition (IWR-1-endo) on osteoblasts/osteoclasts under ELF-EMF exposure",
    "Fracture healing (facilitative effect; in vivo evidence)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In a zebrafish scale fracture model, exposure to 10 mT ELF-EMF at 60 Hz increased the number of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the fractured scale, while 3 or 30 mT did not. Exposure to 10 mT upregulated wnt10b and Wnt target genes and enhanced β-catenin expression at the fracture site; inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin signaling (IWR-1-endo) reduced osteoblasts and osteoclasts under ELF-EMF exposure.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "Exposure duration not reported in abstract",
    "Sample size not reported in abstract",
    "Animal model (zebrafish scales); generalizability to humans not addressed in abstract",
    "Only specific field strengths tested (3, 10, 30 mT) and one frequency (60 Hz)"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "extremely low-frequency EMF",
    "ELF-EMF",
    "60 Hz",
    "10 mT",
    "zebrafish",
    "scale",
    "fracture healing",
    "osteoblast",
    "osteoclast",
    "Wnt/β-catenin",
    "β-catenin",
    "wnt10b",
    "IWR-1-endo"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "elf-emf",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Study investigates extremely low-frequency EMF exposure at 60 Hz."
    },
    {
      "slug": "bone-healing",
      "weight": 0.85,
      "reason": "Outcomes relate to fracture healing and bone cell activity (osteoblasts/osteoclasts)."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1340089
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library