How to improve IARC's RF-EMF cancer hazard communication

{
  "study_type": "review",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "hazard communication",
    "risk perception",
    "cancer hazard communication (IARC RF-EMF evaluation)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The paper addresses experimental risk perception literature related to communication of IARC's radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) evaluation conclusions and derives recommendations to improve that communication.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No specific study design details, methods, or included evidence base are described in the provided abstract.",
    "No health outcome data or quantitative results are reported in the provided abstract."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.66,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "IARC",
    "RF-EMF",
    "radiofrequency electromagnetic fields",
    "cancer",
    "hazard communication",
    "risk perception"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.6,
      "reason": "Focuses on IARC communication regarding RF-EMF carcinogenicity evaluations."
    }
  ]
}